A) INTRODUCTION
1. A gap analysis is a method of
assessing the differences in performance between a business' information systems
to determine whether business requirements are being met and, if not, what
steps should be taken to ensure they are met successfully.
2. Gap refers to the space between
"where we are" (the present state) and "where we want to
be" (the target state).
3. A gap analysis may also be referred
to as a needs analysis, needs assessment or need-gap analysis.
B)
OBJECTIVES
1. Gap Analysis Reports (GAR) is often
used by project managers and process improvement teams.
2. General benefit from performing gap
analysis: when we in the process of figuring out how to allocate
resources.
3. In compliance, a gap analysis can
compare what is required by certain regulations to what is currently being done
to abide by them.
C)
IMPLEMENTATION
1. The first step in conducting a gap
analysis is to establish specific target objectives by looking at the company's
mission statement, strategic goals and improvement objectives.
2. The next step is to analyse current
business mapping processes by collecting relevant data on performance levels
and how resources are presently allocated to these processes.
3. This data can be collected from a
variety of sources depending on what's being analysed, such as by looking at:
i)
Documentation.
ii)
Conducting
Interviews.
iii)
Brainstorming.
iv)
Observing
project activities.
v)
Lastly,
after a management compares its target goals against its current state, it can
then draw up a comprehensive plan that outlines specific steps to take to fill
the gap between its current and future states, and reach its target objectives
D) GAP ANALYSIS PROCESS
1. Identifying the current state.
i. Current
state: A gap analysis template starts off with a column that might be labelled
"Current State," which lists the processes and characteristics an
organization seeks to improve, using factual and specific terms.
ii. Areas
of focus can be broad, targeting the entire business; the focus instead may be
narrow, concentrating on a specific business process, depending on the
company's outlined target objectives.
iii. The
analysis of these focus areas can be either quantitative, such as looking at
the number of customer calls answered within a certain time period; or
qualitative, such as examining the state of diversity in the workplace.
2. Identifying the future state.
i. Future
state: The gap analysis report should also include a column labelled
"Future State," which outlines the target condition the company wants
to achieve.
ii. This
segment also can be drafted in concrete, quantifiable terms, such as aiming to
increase the number of fielded customer calls by a certain percentage within a
specific time period; or in general terms, such as working toward a more
inclusive office culture.
E)
DESCRIBING THE GAP
1. Gap description: This column should
first identify whether a gap exists between a company's current and future
state.
2. If so, the gap description should
then outline what constitutes the gap and the factors that contribute to it.
3. This column lists those reasons in
objective, clear and specific terms.
4. Like the state descriptions, these
components can either be quantifiable, such as a lack of workplace diversity
programs; or qualitative, such as the difference between the number of
currently fielded calls and the target number of fielded calls.
F)
BRIDGING THE GAP
1. Next steps and proposals: This final
column of a gap analysis report should list all the possible solutions that can
be implemented to fill the gap between the current and future states.
2. These objectives must be specific,
directly speak to the factors listed in the gap description above, and be put
in active and compelling terms.
3. Some examples of next steps include
hiring a certain number of additional employees to field customer calls;
instituting a call volume reporting system to guarantee that there are enough
employees to field calls; and launching specific office diversity programs and
resources.
G) GAP ANALYSIS TOOLS AND EXAMPLES
1. McKinsey 7S Framework:
i. This
gap analysis tool, named after consulting firm McKinsey and Co., is used to
determine specific aspects of a management that are meeting expectations.
ii.
An analyst using the 7S model examines the characteristics of business
through the lens of seven people-centric groupings: Strategy, Structure, Systems, Staff, Style, Skills and Shared
values.
iii. The
analyst fills in the current and future state for each category, which would
then highlight where the gaps exist.
iv. The
management can then implement a targeted solution to bridge that gap.
2.
SWOT analysis:
i. SWOT,
which stands for Strengths,
Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats, is a gap analysis strategy used
to identify the internal and external factors that affect the effectiveness and
success of a product, project or person.
ii. Once
these factors are determined, the management can then determine the best
solution by playing to their strengths, allocating resources accordingly, while
at the same time avoiding potential threats.
3.
NADLER-TUSHMAN method:
i. The
Nadler-Tushman organizational congruence method, named after Columbia
University professors David A. Nadler and Michael L. Tushman, examines how
business processes work together and how gaps affect the operational efficiency
of the organization as a whole.
ii. The
method analyses these operational gaps by analysing the organization's
operational system as one that transforms inputs into outputs, dividing the
business processes into three groups: input,
transformation and output.
iii.
Input includes the operational
environment, tangible and intangible resources used, and the company culture.
iv. Transformation encompasses the existing systems,
people and project activities currently in place that convert input into
output.
v. Outputs can take place at a system, group or
individual level.
vi. The
Nadler-Tushman method puts a spotlight on how inadequate inputs and
transformation functions that fail to work together cohesively can lead to
gaps, as well as how gaps in the outputs can point to problems in the inputs
and transformation functions.
vii. This
method highlights how the various components fit together, or are congruent --
the more congruent these parts are, the better a company performs.
viii.
The
Nadler-Tushman method is a dynamic one that changes over time.
Thank you.
#Shared by MKR#